Evidence of an Extraneous Offense Offered to Rebut a Defensive Theory Urged by the Defendant Is Admissible Even Absent a Showing That the Defendant Was the Perpetrator of the Extraneous Offense.

Authors

Daniel J. Sheehan Jr.

Abstract

Abstract Forthcoming.

Publisher

St. Mary's University School of Law

Recommended Citation

Daniel J. Sheehan Jr., Evidence of an Extraneous Offense Offered to Rebut a Defensive Theory Urged by the Defendant Is Admissible Even Absent a Showing That the Defendant Was the Perpetrator of the Extraneous Offense., 4 St. Mary's L.J. (1972).
Available at: https://commons.stmarytx.edu/thestmaryslawjournal/vol4/iss2/5