•  
  •  
 
St. Mary's Journal on Legal Malpractice & Ethics

First Page

342

Date Created

8-2019

Publisher

St. Mary's University School of Law

Editor

Katherine Zampas

Last Page

381

Abstract

At an accelerating pace since the recession, our legal profession has been undergoing structural changes in the delivery of many legal services. At the same time, longstanding principles of ethics continue to govern the day-to-day lives of practicing lawyers.

This article lays out four examples of how meaningful change in lawyer practice has been accomplished since the turn-of-the-century with continued adherence to bedrock professional concepts. First, the rules now embrace the multi-jurisdictional practice of law, while the disciplinary authority of each jurisdiction is emphatically confirmed and strengthened. Second, rules on lawyer advertising are streamlined to grant largely open-ended permission for lawyers to communicate about legal services, while direct solicitation of clients by lawyers remains strictly prohibited. Third, new exceptions to the confidentiality rule permit (and perhaps require) disclosures to prevent and mitigate financial harm, but are confined to circumstances where the lawyer’s legal services were abused and thus largely parallel to the longstanding crime-fraud exception to the attorney-client privilege. Finally, proposals to allow lawyers to engage in multi-disciplinary practice have faltered again and again, and, in any event, have typically been modest in ensuring that ultimate control of entities engaged in legal practice be reserved to lawyers.

In sum, while rules of professional conduct are not static and are constantly under evolutionary revision, the foundational concepts of lawyer ethics remain deeply-rooted.

Download

Share

COinS