"Traditional gender roles and intimate partner violence: Exploring rela" by Carina J. Pawlak
 

Files

Download

Download Full Text (770 KB)

Contributor

Colton Daniels

Digital Publisher

Digital Commons at St. Mary's University

Publication Date

Spring 2025

Keywords

IPV; traditional gender roles;

Description

IPV is the physical, psychological, or sexual aggression by a married, unmarried, or live-in partner (Patra et al., 2018).

- Male perpetrators are reported for 92% of the IPV cases compared to females and are more likely to severely injure or kill their partners (Levitt et al., 2008).

- In a traditional community that had lax attitudes toward IPV, there was an 80% increase in the likelihood of perpetration and women’s consent to the violence increased their likelihood of victimization by 11% (Linos et al., 2013).

- To maintain traditional gender roles found within religious communities, some men may use religion such as using reaffirming Bible verses: “Wives submit yourselves unto your husbands, as unto the Lord” (King James Bible, 1769/2017, Ephesians 5:22). - Masculine gender role stress occurs when men are confronted with threats to their masculinity, which may prompt them to act violently when traditional gender roles are breached (Baugher & Gazmararian, 2015; Baumeister et al., 1996).

- Finkel et al. (2009) found that participants had a higher likelihood of committing IPV if they were low in dispositional self-control.

- Alcohol intoxication was found to be positively correlated with IPV perpetration (Grom et al., 2021).

Format

pdf

Size

1 page

City

San Antonio, Texas

Traditional gender roles and intimate partner violence: Exploring relationships between religion, self-control, and alcohol

Share

COinS