Journal Title

Ohio Northern University Law Review

Volume

40

Issue

1

First Page

105

Document Type

Article

Publication Information

2013

Abstract

This Article addresses the historical developments leading to the Roe decision, reviews the cases that continue to challenge the Court's holding in Roe, and makes recommendations to protect women and minors as long as Roe remains in effect. Part II reflects the historical legal foundations that protected life and the shift in emphasis to a liberty interest that led to the Roe decision. Part III analyzes the factual and legal background of Roe v. Wade, and its companion case of Doe v. Bolton, reveals their basis in lies and deception, and exposes that the Supreme Court's underlying assumptions that are now proven to be incorrect. Part IV assesses how the states have protected women and minors within the constitutional boundaries of Roe and its progeny. Part V provides recommendations for greater protection of women and minors. Part VI concludes that Roe is no longer valid and should be overturned.

Share

COinS
 
 

To view the content in your browser, please download Adobe Reader or, alternately,
you may Download the file to your hard drive.

NOTE: The latest versions of Adobe Reader do not support viewing PDF files within Firefox on Mac OS and if you are using a modern (Intel) Mac, there is no official plugin for viewing PDF files within the browser window.