Journal Title

Wake Forest Law Review Online

Volume

4

Issue

1

First Page

25

Document Type

Article

Publication Information

2014

Abstract

Since the early spring of 2014, the world has watched Russia utilize military forces to invade and annex territory belonging to Ukraine. These actions are, unsurprisingly, raising concerns in Eastern Europe over the prospect of armed conflict in the region, the political consequences of Russian annexation of Ukrainian territory, and the effect of this conflict on ordinary civilians. But there is another potential cost associated with Russia's actions that should not be overlooked - the loss of Ukrainian cultural heritage. History is replete with examples of the destruction of cultural heritage during periods of instability, from Napoleon's systematic looting of Egypt to the state-sanctioned pillage and burning of museums in Kuwait by Iraq during the Persian Gulf War.1 The question now is whether that destiny is inevitable for Ukraine's unique cultural resources, or whether such collateral damage can be prevented.

Recommended Citation

Zoe Niesel, Collateral Damage: Protecting Cultural Heritage in Crimea and Eastern Ukraine, 4 Wake Forest L. Rev. Online 25 (2014).

Share

COinS
 
 

To view the content in your browser, please download Adobe Reader or, alternately,
you may Download the file to your hard drive.

NOTE: The latest versions of Adobe Reader do not support viewing PDF files within Firefox on Mac OS and if you are using a modern (Intel) Mac, there is no official plugin for viewing PDF files within the browser window.