Journal Title

St. Mary's Law Journal

Volume

44

Issue

2

First Page

317

Document Type

Article

Publication Information

2013

Abstract

The historical explanation for the adoption of the conditional sales acts is woefully lacking. How and why the first conditional sales acts arose are investigated. Grant Gilmore, when presenting his theory, confessed ignorance concerning the origins of the conditional sale transaction, first known as Holmes’ notes. The failure of traditional legal historians to explain the passage of the conditional sales acts encourages inquiry into their legislative history to find an explanation. Pre-Act American decisions provide clues regarding the ratification of the acts. The courts provided three explanations for their passage: to treat the conditional sale as a chattel mortgage, to protect good faith purchasers, and to prevent vendee fraud.

Recommended Citation

George Lee Flint, Jr., Secured Transaction History: Protecting Holmes’ Notes Through the Conditional Sales Acts, 44 St. Mary’s L. J. 317 (2013).

Included in

Law Commons

Share

COinS
 
 

To view the content in your browser, please download Adobe Reader or, alternately,
you may Download the file to your hard drive.

NOTE: The latest versions of Adobe Reader do not support viewing PDF files within Firefox on Mac OS and if you are using a modern (Intel) Mac, there is no official plugin for viewing PDF files within the browser window.