Journal Title
American Journal of International Law
Volume
114
Issue
1
First Page
110
Document Type
Article
Publication Information
2020
Abstract
In Vedanta v. Lungowe, the United Kingdom Supreme Court determined that civil claims for negligence brought by Zambian claimants against an English parent company (Vedanta) and its Zambian subsidiary (Konkola Copper Mines plc (KCM)) for damages experienced in Zambia can proceed in English courts. While framed as a domestic tort law case, the decision is significant for international efforts aimed at holding businesses accountable for their "negative impacts" on human rights.' Writing for a unanimous Court, Lord Briggs's judgment hinged narrowly on the right of victims to access substantial justice. More broadly, Lord Briggs suggested that parent companies that hold themselves out in public disclosures as overseeing the human rights, environmental, social, or labor standards employed by their subsidiaries assume a duty of care to those harmed by the subsidiary. This suggestion has the potential to transform current corporate approaches to human rights due diligence and accountability. The plaintiffs are 1,826 Zambians, mostly farmers, who live in four communities
Recommended Citation
Tara Van Ho, Vedanta Resources Plc and Another v. Lungowe and Others, 114 Am. J. Int'l L. 110 (2020).