Journal Title

Review of Litigation





First Page


Document Type


Publication Information



While the use of civilian contractors to support military operations is not a new phenomenon, their use in the War on Terror is unprecedented. The numbers of civilian contractors in active combat zones and the specific activities they perform have significant legal and policy ramifications.

Recent case law associated with civil complaints brought in American courts against contracting companies operating in battlefield environments has given rise to a “political question” doctrine. This doctrine excludes from judicial review all controversies involving policy choices and other value determinations that the Constitution reserves to the Congress and the Executive for resolution.

Due to the complexities involved with the application of the political question doctrine, including determination of the nature and integration of a civilian contractor’s relationship to the military, a thorough overview of this doctrine is necessary. Because political question doctrine represents a formidable jurisdictional shield and will no doubt continue to be a source of jurisprudence and debate in the future, the value of a full understanding of its operation and application can not be overstated.

Recommended Citation

Jeffrey F. Addicott, The Political Question Doctrine and Civil Liability for Contracting Companies on the “Battlefield”, 28 Rev. of Litig. 343 (2008).

Included in

Law Commons



To view the content in your browser, please download Adobe Reader or, alternately,
you may Download the file to your hard drive.

NOTE: The latest versions of Adobe Reader do not support viewing PDF files within Firefox on Mac OS and if you are using a modern (Intel) Mac, there is no official plugin for viewing PDF files within the browser window.