Journal Title

Texas Tech Law Review





First Page


Document Type


Publication Information



It has always been important for judges to observe high ethical standards. However, it has become increasingly common for jurists to be the target of wrath by disappointed partisans. Efforts are being made to personalize, rather than professionalize, the process of judicial criticism, which suggests the development of an unfortunate trend of abusing judges for personal or political advantage.

In the combative atmosphere that now prevails, judges at all levels need to be especially vigilant to avoid ethical improprieties that may unnecessarily provoke bad publicity. The ethics rules that preclude judges and judicial candidates from engaging in inappropriate political activity make an important contribution to protecting judicial integrity and advancing the administration of justice. The ethical limitations applicable to political campaigns, perhaps more than ever, need to be followed and enforced with the same passion that accompanies other aspects of the political process. If they are, the judiciary will take an important step toward weathering the current storm of judicial criticism that recently has attracted so much attention and threatened public confidence in the courts.

Recommended Citation

Vincent R. Johnson, Ethical Campaigning for the Judiciary, 29 Tex. Tech L. Rev. 811 (1998).

Included in

Law Commons



To view the content in your browser, please download Adobe Reader or, alternately,
you may Download the file to your hard drive.

NOTE: The latest versions of Adobe Reader do not support viewing PDF files within Firefox on Mac OS and if you are using a modern (Intel) Mac, there is no official plugin for viewing PDF files within the browser window.