Journal Title

Wake Forest Law Review





First Page


Document Type


Publication Information



This article addresses legislation which was an attempt to accommodate homosexuals serving in the military. The author concludes that Congress had a rational basis for adopting a policy of limited accommodation. The issue of homosexuals in the armed forces presented Congress with a significant challenge to the exercise of its constitutionally-based powers to regulate the military. Prior to the enactment of the “don’t ask, don’t tell” policy, homosexuals were banned from service in the United States military. Congress had the option to continue the ban on homosexuals in the military, become fully accommodating by allowing them to serve openly, or create a compromise in the middle. Congress’ choice of limited accommodation was argued as the best solution due to issues regarding Constitutional rights, military administrative law, and military criminal law. The military is a separate society with standards and disciplines that the average United States citizen would find unbearable. Due to the separate society status of the military, many of the constitutional rights that apply to civilians do not apply to service members. While the “legal Rubik’s cube” is not yet fully solved, Congress’ careful consideration and action provided a sound basis for concluding that it properly exercised its Constitutional powers.

Recommended Citation

David A. Schlueter, Gays and Lesbians in the Military: A Rationally Based Solution to a Legal Rubik’s Cube, 29 Wake Forest L. Rev. 393 (1994).



To view the content in your browser, please download Adobe Reader or, alternately,
you may Download the file to your hard drive.

NOTE: The latest versions of Adobe Reader do not support viewing PDF files within Firefox on Mac OS and if you are using a modern (Intel) Mac, there is no official plugin for viewing PDF files within the browser window.