Journal Title

Oklahoma Law Review





First Page


Document Type


Publication Information



When Warren Burger was appointed Chief Justice in 1969, he was expected to lead the Supreme Court away from its liberal, value-laden approach to constitutional adjudication. Indeed, a retrospective of the court’s work during the seventeen years Warren Burger served as Chief Justice reveals the expected conservative trend of the Chief Justice himself, as well as the Supreme Court generally. It does not, however, reflect wholesale rejection of the most controversial civil liberties decisions rendered by the Warren Court. It is also unclear that Chief Justice Burger was responsible for the Court’s retrenchment on civil liberties where it did occur.

If one tries to discern a strategy in the restructuring of civil liberties, and especially search and seizure rulings, clues of such a strategy are found in the Fourth Amendment decisions of the Burger Court. While it may never be possible to discern which Justices of the Court devised or implemented this strategy, it might at least be possible to describe what the strategy was and anticipate how it might be used in the future. Further, such an analysis may be useful in determining whether this strategy persists in the Rehnquist Court, and what its existence means for the future of the Fourth Amendment.

Recommended Citation

Gerald S. Reamey, Up In Smoke: Fourth Amendment Rights and the Burger Court, 45 Okla. L. Rev. 57 (1992).



To view the content in your browser, please download Adobe Reader or, alternately,
you may Download the file to your hard drive.

NOTE: The latest versions of Adobe Reader do not support viewing PDF files within Firefox on Mac OS and if you are using a modern (Intel) Mac, there is no official plugin for viewing PDF files within the browser window.